Tuesday, 13 June 2006

A few months ago I attended a lecture by Armando Iannucci at The Royal Television Society. It was entitled British TV Comedy: Alive or Dead? I believe it was a condensed version of a series of lectures he gave at Oxford University. One of the clips he showed was from an ITV series from 1979 called "End of Part One" (coincidently starring, among others, Sue Holderness who I have been working with) and it was one of the funniest things I have ever seen in my life. There's no point describing it here because I wont do it justice but suffice to say it had me screaming and crying with laughter; much to my embarrassment, surrounded in the lecture theatre by every high level TV executive known to man. I must point out that I was not the only person laughing, but when I find something that amusing I seem to have less vocal inhibitions than others. How on earth was something this surreal and hilarious (you'll have to take my word for it, it was) allowed to be on at 5pm, ITV - the Little & Large slot for gods sake (yes, I know L&L were BBC but you know what I mean). Surely people watching TV at Saturday teatime wouldn't appreciate it?? Hmmm, what was the point of all this… oh yeah, I know, I had a dip into my new complete Laurel and Hardy DVD box set today and was once again reduced to a screaming mess watching Stan and Ollie, this time clean up a house to music in "The Music Box". Were things allowed to be this funny in 1931? I refuse to believe that the audiences of that era were sophisticated enough to appreciate every nuance from the legendary duo. Did they really understand every hapless gesture from Laurel, every pedantic twitch from Hardy? Of course they did, because not everyone feels the need to analyse comedy, they laugh because it's funny. Which begs the question, why the fuck are people laughing at "My Family"?